Monday, May 09, 2005
In yesterday’s Sunday Times India Knight criticises the mainstreaming of porn via lad mags such as FHM, Nuts, Zoo et al:
Porn has become more and more mainstream in the past few years, and these ultra-successful magazines are vivid proof of it: though they present themselves as jolly enough to appeal to your 14-year-old son, they are, to all intents and purposes, pornographic. . . . What I don’t like is the way in which pornography has seeped into the mainstream: from sleazy TV ad campaigns to billboard advertising . . . , like all men’s magazines, they have done their bit for sneaking porn into the mainstream. . . . Thank goodness these magazines are headed back to the top shelf, where they belong.
But, ah, the irony.
I think there’s some good arguments to be had about this phenomenon that India Knight describes and it’s interesting in a way to find illustration for it right in the same pages were she is criticising it. Some day, I will turn my attention to these issues. But until then: argue amongst yourselves.
Labels: nation